When should I use ADR for an HMRC dispute?

Use ADR when the dispute is stuck, communication has broken down, the issues are complex, or you want to avoid the cost and delay of a Tribunal appeal. ADR is not suitable for disputes on a point of law or where HMRC's position is clearly correct. ADR is suitable for HMRC disputes in the following circumstances: (1) Stuck dispute — the taxpayer and HMRC are stuck in their positions, with neither party willing to compromise. The mediator can facilitate a discussion that breaks the deadlock. (2) Communication breakdown — there are communication breakdowns between the taxpayer and HMRC, and the parties are not listening to each other. The mediator can improve communication and help the parties understand each other's positions. (3) Complex issues — the dispute involves complex issues that would benefit from a structured discussion, rather than a formal Tribunal hearing. (4) Cost and delay — the taxpayer wants to avoid the cost and delay of a Tribunal appeal. ADR is typically faster (1-3 months) and free. (5) Creative solutions — the taxpayer wants to explore creative solutions that a Tribunal cannot order (e.g., a payment plan, a different interpretation of the law). ADR is NOT suitable for: (a) Disputes on a point of law — where the Tribunal is the appropriate forum for determining the legal question. (b) Where HMRC's position is clearly correct — if the taxpayer has no arguable case, ADR will not help. (c) Where the taxpayer needs a binding precedent — ADR does not create a binding precedent, unlike a Tribunal decision. Relevant legislation: TCEA 2007, Section 34 (ADR); HMRC ADR guidance. Example: A taxpayer is in a dispute with HMRC over the classification of a worker (employment vs self-employment). The parties are stuck, and communication has broken down. ADR is suitable — the mediator can facilitate a discussion and help the parties reach a compromise. A dispute on the interpretation of a specific tax statute is less suitable for ADR (the Tribunal is the better forum for determining the legal question). Common mistake: Using ADR for disputes that are purely on a point of law. ADR is a mediation process, not a legal determination. For legal questions, the Tribunal is the appropriate forum.

How do I apply for ADR with HMRC?

Apply for ADR through HMRC's online ADR application form or by post. Either the taxpayer or HMRC can apply. HMRC will assess whether ADR is suitable and, if so, assign a mediator. The process typically takes 1-3 months. To apply for ADR with HMRC: (1) Application form — the taxpayer (or their agent) can apply for ADR using HMRC's online ADR application form (available on GOV.UK) or by post. The form requires: (a) the taxpayer's details, (b) the dispute details (the tax year, the amount in dispute, the issues), (c) why ADR is being requested, (d) what the taxpayer hopes to achieve. (2) HMRC assessment — HMRC assesses whether ADR is suitable for the dispute. ADR may be declined if: (a) the dispute is on a point of law, (b) HMRC's position is clearly correct, (c) the dispute is not suitable for mediation. (3) Mediator assignment — if ADR is accepted, HMRC assigns a trained mediator (not involved in the original dispute). (4) Sessions — the mediator contacts both parties to arrange mediation sessions. The sessions can be by phone, video, or in person. (5) Joint and separate sessions — the mediator may hold separate sessions with each party (to understand their positions and concerns) and joint sessions (to facilitate discussion). (6) Resolution — if the parties reach an agreement, the mediator helps document the agreement, and the dispute is resolved. If not, the taxpayer can proceed to the Tribunal. The ADR process typically takes 1-3 months from application to resolution. HMRC can also apply for ADR (if they believe it may help resolve the dispute). Relevant legislation: TCEA 2007, Section 34 (ADR); HMRC ADR guidance and application process. Example: A taxpayer applies for ADR using the online form, stating the dispute details (a £50,000 assessment for the 2023/24 tax year) and why ADR is being requested (communication breakdown with the HMRC officer). HMRC assesses the application and accepts it. A mediator is assigned, and mediation sessions are held over 2 months. The parties reach an agreement, and the assessment is reduced to £20,000. Common mistake: Not applying for ADR until the dispute is at a late stage (e.g., after the Tribunal appeal has been filed). ADR can be used at any stage, but applying earlier can save time and cost. The taxpayer should apply as soon as it becomes clear that the dispute is stuck.

Yes. ADR discussions are confidential and cannot be used in a subsequent Tribunal appeal. This allows both parties to be open and explore settlement options without fear that their statements will be used against them. Confidentiality is a key feature of ADR: (1) Confidential discussions — all discussions during the ADR process are confidential. Neither party can disclose what was discussed to the Tribunal or any other third party. (2) Cannot be used in Tribunal — statements made during ADR cannot be used as evidence in a subsequent Tribunal appeal. This means the taxpayer can be open about their position, weaknesses, and willingness to compromise, without fear that HMRC will use this against them in the Tribunal. (3) Without prejudice — ADR discussions are 'without prejudice', meaning they are made on the basis that they will not be used in legal proceedings. This is a standard legal protection for settlement discussions. (4) Exceptions — the confidentiality does not apply to: (a) facts that were known before the ADR, (b) evidence that is independent of the ADR discussions, (c) information that must be disclosed by law. (5) Agreement — if the parties reach an agreement during ADR, the agreement itself is binding (and can be disclosed). Only the discussions leading to the agreement are confidential. The confidentiality of ADR is one of its key advantages — it allows both parties to be open and explore settlement options, which can lead to a resolution that would not be possible in the adversarial Tribunal environment. Relevant legislation: TCEA 2007, Section 34 (ADR — confidentiality); Civil Evidence Act 1995 (without prejudice communications). Example: During ADR, the taxpayer admits that they are unsure about the strength of their case and would accept a reduced assessment. This admission is confidential and cannot be used by HMRC in a Tribunal appeal. If the ADR does not resolve the dispute, HMRC cannot tell the Tribunal that the taxpayer was unsure about their case. Common mistake: Being guarded during ADR and not being open about the weaknesses in the case. The confidentiality of ADR is designed to allow open discussion, and being guarded can prevent the parties from reaching a resolution.

What are the success rates of ADR with HMRC?

HMRC reports that a significant proportion of ADR cases result in a full or partial resolution (typically around 70-80%). ADR is most effective for disputes where both parties are willing to compromise and where the issues are suitable for mediation. ADR has a high success rate with HMRC disputes: (1) HMRC reports that around 70-80% of ADR cases result in a full or partial resolution. (2) Success factors — the success of ADR depends on: (a) Willingness to compromise — both parties must be willing to consider compromise. If one party is unwilling, ADR is unlikely to succeed. (b) Suitable issues — the issues must be suitable for mediation (e.g., factual disputes, communication breakdowns, rather than pure points of law). (c) Authority to settle — both parties must have the authority to settle the dispute. The HMRC officer must have the authority to agree a settlement, or the ADR may be futile. (d) Good preparation — both parties should prepare for the ADR, identifying the key issues, the strengths and weaknesses of their case, and their preferred outcome. (3) When ADR succeeds — ADR is most successful when: (a) The dispute is stuck and the parties need a neutral mediator to break the deadlock. (b) Communication has broken down and the mediator can improve communication. (c) The parties are willing to explore creative solutions. (4) When ADR does not succeed — ADR may not succeed when: (a) One party is unwilling to compromise. (b) The dispute is on a point of law that requires a Tribunal determination. (c) The gap between the parties' positions is too large. Even if ADR does not fully resolve the dispute, it can narrow the issues and facilitate a partial resolution, which can make the subsequent Tribunal appeal more focused and efficient. Relevant legislation: TCEA 2007, Section 34 (ADR); HMRC ADR annual reports. Example: A taxpayer disputes an assessment for £100,000. They apply for ADR. During mediation, the parties discuss the issues, and the taxpayer agrees to accept a reduced assessment of £60,000. HMRC agrees to the reduction. The dispute is resolved (partial resolution — the taxpayer pays less than the original assessment but more than they initially wanted). Common mistake: Assuming that ADR is a waste of time because HMRC will not compromise. In practice, HMRC's ADR mediators are genuinely committed to facilitating a resolution, and the success rates are high.

Tax Disputes › Appeals

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) with HMRC

ADR is a free HMRC service for resolving tax disputes without a Tribunal hearing. Understand how it works, when to use it, and the benefits of this mediation-based approach.

Book a Consultation +44 (0) 800 211 8657

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a free HMRC service that uses mediation to resolve tax disputes without the need for a Tribunal hearing. ADR can be used at any stage of a dispute, from the initial enquiry through to the Tribunal appeal stage. It is particularly effective for disputes where the parties are stuck in their positions and need a neutral mediator to facilitate a resolution. Understanding ADR and when to use it can save time, cost, and stress compared to a Tribunal appeal.

How ADR Works

ADR uses a trained HMRC mediator (not involved in the dispute) to facilitate a resolution between the taxpayer and HMRC. The mediator does not make a decision — they help the parties communicate, identify the issues, and explore settlement options. The process is voluntary, confidential, and non-binding. If ADR does not resolve the dispute, the taxpayer can still appeal to the Tribunal.

When to Use ADR

ADR is suitable when: (1) The dispute is stuck, with neither party willing to compromise. (2) There are communication breakdowns between the taxpayer and HMRC. (3) The issues are complex and would benefit from a structured discussion. (4) The taxpayer wants to avoid the cost and delay of a Tribunal appeal. ADR is not suitable for disputes that are purely on a point of law (where the Tribunal is the appropriate forum) or where HMRC's position is clearly correct.

The ADR Process

The ADR process: (1) Application — the taxpayer or HMRC applies for ADR. (2) Assessment — HMRC assesses whether ADR is suitable for the dispute. (3) Mediator — a trained mediator is assigned (not involved in the original dispute). (4) Sessions — the mediator holds sessions with the taxpayer and HMRC, separately and/or jointly. (5) Resolution — if the parties reach an agreement, the dispute is resolved. If not, the taxpayer can proceed to the Tribunal. The process typically takes 1-3 months.

Benefits of ADR

Benefits of ADR: (1) Free — there is no cost (unlike a Tribunal appeal). (2) Quick — typically 1-3 months (vs. 6-12 months for a Tribunal appeal). (3) Confidential — the discussions are confidential and cannot be used in a Tribunal appeal. (4) Non-binding — if ADR does not resolve the dispute, the taxpayer can still appeal to the Tribunal. (5) Flexible — the mediator can explore creative solutions that a Tribunal cannot. (6) Preserves relationships — ADR is less adversarial than a Tribunal appeal, which can help preserve the relationship between the taxpayer and HMRC.

Key Points

What You Need to Know

ADR is a free HMRC mediation service for resolving tax disputes
It uses a neutral mediator (not involved in the dispute) to facilitate resolution
ADR is voluntary, confidential, and non-binding
If ADR does not resolve the dispute, the taxpayer can still appeal to the Tribunal
ADR is typically faster (1-3 months) than a Tribunal appeal (6-12 months)

Expert Answers

Tax Disputes Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed answers with legislation references, practical examples and common pitfalls.

Explore More

All Tax Disputes Topics

HMRC Self-Assessment Enquiries Code of Practice 8 (COP8)Code of Practice 9 (COP9)HMRC Penalties Statutory Reviews of HMRC Decisions First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)Worldwide Disclosure Facility (WDF)HMRC Nudge Letters HMRC Offshore Disclosure Campaigns HMRC Discovery Assessments HMRC Information Notices Corporate Criminal Offence: Failure to Prevent Tax Facilitation VAT Disputes & Tribunals IR35 & Off-Payroll Working Disputes Transfer Pricing Disputes

Need Specialist Tax Disputes Advice?

Our tax advisers can help you navigate tax disputes with clear, practical advice tailored to your circumstances.

Book a Consultation Call +44 (0) 800 211 8657